I hope someone has an answer to this! I cannot imagine why it is configured this way--makes absolutely no sense to me.Has anyone figured out how to bypass the hatch not opening with the rear window rolled down?
My best guess is physics. You move more weight to end of a lever it requires more force to move the lever. This is probably to protect the motors that operate the liftgate.I hope someone has an answer to this! I cannot imagine why it is configured this way--makes absolutely no sense to me.
With further experimentation, I did find the handle does indeed work the way i expected. I will assume the buttons will, too.That is the way it works. I changed mine in settings so that touching the door (or passenger) handle unlocks all doors on first touch, but the default is driver only, hold for all. I rarely use the fob, but I am pretty sure the default is once for driver, then again for all (at least that is what it is for our RAV4 and other vehicles I have driven).
I like the way my wife's car does it. Tapping it increases/decreases by 1mph, holding it makes it jump in 5mph increments. It's perfect.I woild prefer that the criise control +/- buttons were two stage. First stage, 1mph change, second stage 5mph change.
Actually after reading your reply, I decided to try out ECO mode because in 9 months of ownership, I have never done so. Yes, running it in ECO mode eliminates the low speed gear searching that I have in the regular mode. I guess I will be using ECO mode unless I am on the interstate or other high speed roads. Having said that if I cannot just leave it in one mode for all driving it would have been nice to be able to change modes from the steering wheel, like on a Porsche. Toyota should tune that tranny to run well in all modes. It is just software mapping. I do not mind ECO, but it is a little bit toothless in that mode....but very smooth.Interesting. I am in Southern California, so definitely experience bumper to bumper and parking lots a fair amount--but even in those circumstances, in ECO all the time, I have not noticed any issue. Maybe the hybrid system helps?
1. I find it interesting the varying MPG numbers. It appears that Pro and Trailhunter may generally experience less, but I also hear ORP and others giving poor numbers. Over 17,000+ miles I average between 23 and 24 MPG (not counting actual off-road travel).1) Better gas mileage, even driving conservatively I have never gotten 23 mpg. Near impossible to stay in 'electric mode' at slow speeds. But love the torque when off road
2) Fold flat back seat. The strap tether to secure the seats is a real joke
3) The 14" display is absolutely great for maps apps. But beside that, Toyota does not use the screen space at all. What poor software architecture planning and implementation. A huge miss.
4) More tie down locations in back. Would be nice tie downs under driver and passenger seat to secure loads on the back seat. You loose too much space when folding down the rear seats, I never fold the seats, and use a net to hold gear on the seats.
5) They should have installed on ORPs with 17" wheels, not 18". I'll be dumping my 18" as soon as I use the stock tires a little more before replacing them.
6) Larger cup holders in the doors. They are too small in diameter to be useful.
7) Too many beeps for this and that...
But overall, I love my ORP and am so happy that I bought it. It is a pleasure to drive.
I find the Air conditioning to be excellent. In my 4 Runner it freezes me out.Along with a handful of things already mentioned, I’ve felt like the air conditioner is lack luster since I bought the car.
I guess it does a decent job bringing the overall temperature down and the air at the vent is cold but I have to have it full blast to feel it blowing on my face. Personally think it’s due to how massive the vents are, they probably move the same amount of air but not forcefully.
Our Subaru feels like it’ll blow my hat off at 3/4 power so perhaps just what we were used to.