- Joined
- Mar 26, 2026
- Threads
- 2
- Messages
- 18
- Reaction score
- 5
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Vehicle(s)
- 4Runner 2026 Platinum
- Thread starter
- #1
Ran both KO3 (LT285/70R17 C, RWL ~51lb on Method 703 Gloss Titanium 17x8.5, 35mm offset, 32.7") and Yokohama G057 (285/50R20 on OEM 20x7, 31.5") on my 2026 4Runner Platinum.
Both were set around ~37 PSI warm, and this is all on-road driving (no off-road yet), but my local streets are so bad they might as well count.
What I expected:
Holy
complete opposite!
Yokohama G057 (XL):
KO3 (RWL, Load C):
Important detail:
The KO3 I’m running is the RWL (white letters) version (~51 lbs), not the heavier ORBL (~57 lbs).
Still an A/T tire, but worth calling out since weight might play a role.
No data on MPG yet
I didn't feel much of a difference in acceleration or breaking
The "bigger" tire fits the spare space no issue,
Both were set around ~37 PSI warm, and this is all on-road driving (no off-road yet), but my local streets are so bad they might as well count.
What I expected:
- Yokohama = smoother, more comfortable
- KO3 = stiffer, more “truck-like”
Holy
Yokohama G057 (XL):
- feels stiff over pretty much everything
- harsh on small cracks and rough pavement
- at low speeds (~25 mph on bad streets), it’s just busy and uncomfortable
- on the freeway it gets floaty latterly, bouncing side to side
- steering feels less precise, kinda vague
KO3 (RWL, Load C):
- WAY softer
- genuinely absorbs imperfections instead of transmitting them, it's like erasing them.
- zero vibration
- still quiet, even up to ~90 mph
- steering is noticeably more precise, more feedback
- very stable at speed, no floating feeling
Important detail:
The KO3 I’m running is the RWL (white letters) version (~51 lbs), not the heavier ORBL (~57 lbs).
Still an A/T tire, but worth calling out since weight might play a role.
No data on MPG yet
I didn't feel much of a difference in acceleration or breaking
The "bigger" tire fits the spare space no issue,
Sponsored