Sponsored

Gumpus

SR5
Well-known member
Joined
Apr 15, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
88
Reaction score
76
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
4Runner
I'm going to somewhat disagree with you. Yes, the engineers know what they are doing but the pressure to increase MPG and please the EPA and CARB regulations actually trumps longevity and best practice.

I feel much better running a higher viscosity down here, especially if the engine is under heavy load. On my 2015 Mustang, the manual called for 5W 20 and I ran 5W 40 for nearly 140,000 miles. When the hail totaled that car, the engine was running as strong as ever and easily could have gotten to 300K. That year 5.0 engine was notorious for blowing and I read countless horror stories on the 6g forums. I feel I made the right choice.
All of the design validation (dyno and vehicle based durability testing) is done with factory-specified oil weight...it's the only oil that's been proven. Your oil performs many functions....splash lubrication, cooling, hydrodynamic lubrication for some bearings like main bearings and con rods, and some vehicles use oil pressure to operate the variable valve timing. You seem to be saying that you want heavy oil for heavy loads but hydrodynamic lubrication supports parts on an oil film...they never touch. The bearing clearances are chosen partly based on oil weight. As one Mazda engine engineer said, the oil is part of a system (actually part of several systems). In principle heavier oil creates more friction which creates more load on the engine and more heat, it takes longer to circulate on start-up, it can't be better for splash lubrication of cylinder walls, it's going to be less effective for cooling. Maybe you'll get lucky by second guessing the manufacturer or maybe you'll suffer unintended consequences of changing one component in your lubrication and cooling systems.
Sponsored

 

KneticNrg

TRD Off-Road Premium
Member
Joined
May 22, 2026
Threads
0
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2026 TRD Offroad Premium
Recommended "soft" break-in vs. a "hard" break-in

I may be opening up can of worms with this ? but anyone not believe in following recommended break-in period procedure, but instead prefer a hard break-in where you drive the engine hard from day 1?

Hard break-in theory being that it'll result in allow piston rings to seat better against cylinder walls, which results in better power, compressions, fuel efficiency and engine life...
I come from the auto parts industry and do a medium hard break-in, not OEM soft but not radically hard.
 
 







Top