Not arguing against your point. I understand that’s how capitalism works sometimes.you do realize toyota has to pay someone for that feature/updates. if you want updates you pay for it. my 2014, i never updated the maps in 12 yrs.
google pays for it also but the cost is not passed onto consumer's. usually business pay for the api use for themselves or thru ads.
trust me, that free stuff from google is being paid by someone (and as a consumer your data is being harvested so you are indirectly paying for it)
But I have a 22 Ram pickup and a 25 MB Sprinter. Neither of them required me to subscribe for navigation. Certainly their cost for that is built into the selling price of each vehicle. Toyota should have done the same.
Compound that with the price increase for a 25 Pro vs the previous gen 5 Pro: increased from $57K to $70K. Seemed kind of like a slap in the face to then have to pay for navigation - which was included for no additional fee in the 5th gen.
And, yes, there is way more technology in that newer Pro (which my salesman was quick to point out), but that is countered by the (as yet) unanswered question of reliability on the 4 cyl hybrid.
Don’t get me wrong. I love my Pro. It just feels like Toyota took the wrong approach. If it had cost $70.5K I still would have bought it and would not be ranting here right now.
Sponsored