Full List: 2025 4Runner Reviews (6th Gen) Are Here!

[visually oriented]

Has anybody watched all of the videos? Have any trends emerged?

Most of the videos I watched called out engine noise, and little else other than price as negatives.

The other frequent cons mentioned:
- Lots of hard plastics
- Very light, numb steering
- Ride quality... better than previous gen. but still rides like a body-on-frame vehicle.

Multiple writers also expressed confusion regarding Toyota's line-up and pricing, ie. for the price of a Trailhunter you can get a GX. How do the 4Runner and Land Cruiser go together, etc.

Sponsored

 

[TRD Pro or Die Trying]

Has anybody watched all of the videos? Have any trends emerged?

Most of the videos I watched called out engine noise, and little else other than price as negatives.

I've watched most of them. Here's the deal....Toyota paid for all these reviewers to come out to San Diego, put them up in a nice hotel, gave them nice meals, and most importantly exclusive access to these 6th gen 4Runners. No one is going to give any harsh criticisms in their reviews. Subtle criticisms, yes, but nothing too negative. They all want to be invited to upcoming Toyota events. I try to keep this in mind as I get super excited about the 6th gen.

 

[MJE]

The other frequent cons mentioned:
Multiple writers also expressed confusion regarding Toyota's line-up and pricing, ie. for the price of a Trailhunter you can get a GX. How do the 4Runner and Land Cruiser go together, etc.

I read one of those articles, but I’m not sure I get the confusion. Toyota offers 3 different midsize BOF TNGA-F SUVs. It’s no surprise that the more expensive variants of one line would overlap with the cheaper variants of another model. Doing B&P for my own needs there seems to be some separation in pricing, though that may not be true for every individual.

Of course there’s many differentiating factors among the 3, perhaps looks & powertrain being the biggest. Are the writers just too young to remember when GM would sell you the same car in 4 different wrappers (or the same wrapper with different head & tail lights at best) depending on how much money they thought they could extract from you for the payment? While I appreciate the criticism recognizing that people will cross shop all 3, I can’t say I see it as valid.

 

[mars001]

They sure didn't want to bite the hands that fed them ? They may even receive a list of "authorized things that can be criticized" before the event ?

I've watched most of them. Here's the deal....Toyota paid for all these reviewers to come out to San Diego, put them up in a nice hotel, gave them nice meals, and most importantly exclusive access to these 6th gen 4Runners. No one is going to give any harsh criticisms in their reviews. Subtle criticisms, yes, but nothing too negative. They all want to be invited to upcoming Toyota events. I try to keep this in mind as I get super excited about the 6th gen.

 

[KTRAN]

Review: How Does the 2025 4Runner Stack Up to the Original? by TFL





Podcast: After Over A Decade We Finally Get Our Hands On The New Toyota 4Runner! [TFL Talk]

 

[4running]

SR5 drive review

 

[Nodak]

thats not how it works. toyota will just not invite them to future events . passive agressive

 

[Parker516]

First 2025 4Runner (TRD Off-Road) to go offroading/crawling at Moab, by the TFL guys.

 

[Nodak]

yeah each person has their own opinion. i am ready for a new 4R regardless of the pro's/con's of the new one.

this platinum will be my retirement vehicle. after i pay it off i will be at 62/63 so i can start my retirement from civil service (usaf)

it will have everything i want.

heated steering wheel, heated seats (have that now), better tire psi readings (my current one only say low tire so i have to check each one, which sucks when its -10F and 30+ mph winds, like yesterday), hud (nice but polarized clip on sunglasses dont help), no 3rd row (i optioned my current 4R to specifically not have 3rd row), better tech (this is a big one compared to my current one) such as 360 view, TSS 3.0 (remote start, digital key)

all i need is FT 4WD which my current limited has, but i am trying to convince the wife to downgrade from our tundra platinum to a 4R platinum since she is get tired of parking outside during our horrible winters since the tundra will NOT fit in the garage. she really misses that when she had her tacoma's. maybe this 4R plat will convince her to jump ship, if not its a win either way for her or me. if she jumps to the 4R i can trade her tundra in for a another 4R in silver or red. only reason i am getting a heritage blue is because blue is her favorite color (i prefer silver)

 

[Trailhunter4R]

VIDEO:





SUMMARY for those that prefer reading

• ? Off-Road Challenge:
  Mission is to find out which one performs better off-road in Moab's challenging terrain.
  
  
• ? Off-Road Technologies and Features:
  The Land Cruiser and 4Runner are both equipped with off-road essentials, but their approaches differ. The Land Cruiser features a full-time 4WD system with a locking center differential and sway bar disconnect, providing better ride comfort and articulation. The 4Runner, lighter and more nimble, comes with part-time 4WD, multi-terrain select (MTS), and a locking rear differential. Both vehicles feature advanced off-road modes to tackle various terrains.
  
  
• ? Obstacle Breakdown:
  Several obstacles in Moab test the approach and departure angles, ground clearance, and traction of each vehicle:
  • Chin Scratcher: Tests the vehicle's approach and departure angles.
  • Frame Bender: A steep descent that challenges traction control.
  • One Tree Hill: A steep climb where traction and wheel articulation are critical.
  • The Wall: The ultimate test, combining steep inclines and declines, approach angles, and undercarriage protection.
• ? Tires and Ground Clearance Analysis:
  Both vehicles use tires sized at 265/70R18 but differ in performance due to tire brands and designs. The 4Runner has Falcon tires, while the Land Cruiser uses Michelins. The Land Cruiser’s ground clearance is quoted at about 8 inches, which helps with articulation and protection, though actual measurements can vary based on terrain.
  
  
• ? Performance on Moab's Trails:
  • The Land Cruiser, with its hybrid engine, delivers 326 horsepower and 465 lb-ft of torque, making it powerful and smooth on trails. Its disconnectable sway bar enhances articulation and comfort.
  • The 4Runner, although lacking a hybrid system, provides 278 horsepower and 317 lb-ft of torque, with impressive low-end torque delivery, making it a contender despite its smaller engine.
  • The 4Runner’s lightweight design gives it an edge in terms of nimbleness, particularly on technical climbs. Its slightly shorter wheelbase improves maneuverability, especially on narrow trails.
• ? Challenges and Damage Assessment:
  • On the “Chin Scratcher” obstacle, both vehicles struggled with their approach and departure angles. The Land Cruiser experienced damage to its rear components, while the 4Runner showed better results due to its higher departure angle.
  • On the “Wall,” the Land Cruiser’s additional weight led to minor undercarriage damage, while the 4Runner had an easier climb but sacrificed a side step due to limited rocker protection.
• ? Driver Impressions:
  The Land Cruiser offers better visibility and seating position due to its upright design, while the 4Runner provides a sportier and more agile feel. The Land Cruiser is praised for its smooth ride, thanks to the sway bar disconnect, while the 4Runner’s precise steering and predictable handling win praise on technical terrain.
  
  
• ? Final Takeaways and Recommendations:
  Both vehicles excel off-road, but TFL leans toward the 4Runner due to its affordability, simplicity, and performance in real-world trail conditions. They recommend the 4Runner TRD Off-Road trim without the premium package for budget-conscious off-road enthusiasts and suggest a base Land Cruiser for those willing to upgrade tires and accessories.

Conclusion: while the Land Cruiser offers advanced off-road tech and comfort, the 4Runner’s lighter weight and agility make it a favorite for serious off-roading adventures. Both vehicles remain capable but cater to slightly different off-road needs.​

 

[MG-OR]

Adding to the list of reviews.

TFL's 2025 4Runner TRD Off-Road 6th gen towing test vs. Land Cruiser. Tow Haul Mode was used and the 4Runner towed better than the LC!




TLDW text summary:

Summary

• ? Introduction of the All-New 2025 Toyota 4Runner
  The video showcases the improved towing capacity of up to 6,000 lbs, tested on the challenging Ike Gauntlet towing route.
• ? Initial Setup and Towing Conditions
  The towing test involves a 5,500 lb trailer, featuring a Honda Acti K truck, with a Big Tex steel car hauler. The team compares the 4Runner’s performance with the new Toyota Land Cruiser.
• ? Brake Application Analysis
  The team observes eight official brake applications, significantly fewer than the Land Cruiser's 12. Fewer applications indicate better control and reduced brake overheating.
• ? Performance Stability on Steep Grades
  Despite the shorter wheelbase, the 4Runner maintains impressive stability with minimal trailer sway, thanks to its full-time 4WD.
• Engine and Transmission Overview
  Equipped with a 2.4L turbocharged 4-cylinder engine generating 278 HP and 317 lb-ft torque, paired with an 8-speed automatic transmission, the 4Runner proves reliable for steep hill climbs.
• Efficient Uphill Performance
  Accelerates smoothly with minimal strain while towing the maximum weight. The climb to 11,158 ft was completed in 7:53 minutes—better than the Land Cruiser.
• ? Vehicle Adjustments for Towing
  The team highlights Toyota’s recommendation for using a weight-distribution hitch for enhanced stability, though they tested without one to gauge performance.
• ? Comparative Insights on Pricing and Features
  The 4Runner’s model is priced around $58,000, comparable to the Land Cruiser. However, differences in features, such as trailer brake controllers, affect practicality.
• ? Driver Feedback and Interior Features
  Mirrors and instrument layouts are sufficient for this towing test but lack detailed numerical readouts. The cabin remained quiet at around 60 dB.
• ? Surprising Overall Results
  The 2025 4Runner surpassed the Land Cruiser in brake performance and achieved similar uphill efficiency, proving that it can effectively tow heavy loads when needed.

Insights Based on Numbers

• ? 8 Brake Applications vs. 12: The 4Runner required 8 brake applications compared to the Land Cruiser’s 12 during the downhill test, highlighting its improved braking efficiency and control.
• ? 7:53 vs. 8:13 Uphill Timing: The 4Runner’s 7-minute 53-second uphill climb outperformed the Land Cruiser's 8:13, demonstrating its efficient power and torque balance despite lower output.

 

[Parker516]

2025 Toyota 4Runner First Drive Review

Sponsored